What do fundamentalists think of the 7 books deleted from the original Bible?

Fundamentalists are pretty extreme on literalism,as compared to the major denominations. They recoil at any suggestion of reediting the Bible. And yet the version they read doesn't have seven books that were a part of it for 1500 years - three-fourths of the Christian era - and it doesn't seem to bother them at all. Why not? Just because the Church of England excluded them while the Catholic Church kept them? Fundamentalists are not Anglican (Episcopalian over here),so why should they care what theChurch of England did,or what the Catholics didn't do? We have it in it's original form,you'd think as literalist as fundamentalists are they would be outraged to learn the King Jimmy is missing seven books. So why not? And what do they think?